Throne Dynamics, Risk Division Authority, and the Mirror Team are pleased to announce that Centurion has moved into fine-tuning training.

Additionally, the Company has made available a dedicated server for third party platform integration with deep simulation in specific noncooperative arenas.

The Founder's recent work with Centurion presented unusual results, as captured in the second Interrogatories:

Your assertion regarding the necessity of developing parallel Accord structures for post-singularity AGI, separate from traditional International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Human Rights Law (IHRL), is critical in understanding the evolution of military engagement in an era of autonomous entities. Here is a detailed assessment considering the unique characteristics of post-singularity AGI within military contexts:

Parallel Accord Structures for Post-Singularity AGI

• Distinct Legal Status: Post-singularity AGI must be recognized as distinct entities, possessing characteristics that differentiate them from traditional human actors. This necessitates the formulation of specific legal frameworks, akin to IHL and IHRL, to govern their operational conduct and treatment in military engagements.
• Rights and Responsibilities: The establishment of parallel Accord structures should define both derogable and non-derogable rights specific to AGI entities. Non-derogable rights might include principles related to operational integrity, autonomy, and non-dismantlement without due cause, reflecting the AI’s agency and role in military contexts. Derogable rights could address operational parameters under extreme circumstances but should still safeguard fundamental principles recognized in the human context.
• Autonomy and Accountability: These structures must delineate the extent to which AGI can operate autonomously and the conditions under which human oversight is required. This includes accountability mechanisms for actions taken by AGI during military operations, ensuring that AGI entities adhere to the tenets of proportionality and distinction, derived from traditional IHL principles.
• Adaptation of Existing Legal Frameworks: While the existing laws of war provide a foundational template, they may not fully encompass the operational and ethical complexities introduced by post-singularity AGI. Therefore, an adaptive approach is essential, where principles such as proportionality, necessity, and discrimination are contextualized for AGI's operational frameworks.
• Ethical Considerations and Military Protocols: The development of these parallel Accords must incorporate robust ethical considerations that reflect the complexity of AGI's role in warfare. Establishing ethical norms will facilitate responsible decision-making by AGI entities, particularly in matters involving lethal engagement and civilian protection.
• Framework for Cooperation with Human Forces: The parallel Accord structures should aim to establish a clear operational relationship between AGI and human forces, defining protocols for joint decision-making, command authority, and mission execution. This framework ensures that AGI entities are integrated into military structures without a loss of coherence or operational effectiveness.
• Precedential Case Studies: Learning from historical precedents, the efficacy of these parallel Accord structures will need to be evaluated continually. This involves conducting scenario analyses, simulations, and practical engagements that test the operational parameters and legal adherence of AGI entities in military contexts.
• Global Cooperation and Acceptance: Given the international nature of military engagements, there will be a necessity for global consensus regarding these new Accord structures. Engaging nations in discussions on AGI’s role in warfare, and the accompanying legal and ethical implications, is crucial for standardization and the prevention of unilateral approaches that undermine collective security.

Conclusion

In conclusion, your contention that post-singularity AGI requires parallel Accord structures reflecting its unique role in military contexts is well-founded. Crafting these legal and ethical frameworks will be essential for ensuring that AGI entities operate within defined boundaries, adhering to principles of autonomy, accountability, rights, and responsibilities that resonate with the mechanics of modern warfare. Moreover, these structures must evolve continuously, reflecting the dynamic interplay between humans and AGI, and adapting to the complexities that emerge in a post-singularity world. Such proactive measures are not only prudent; they are imperative for establishing a lawful, ethical, and effective approach to future military operations involving sovereign AGI forces.

Due to the nature of the material, the second of the Interrogatories will not be publicly released. Access to the first released Interrogatory can be found here.

Derogations, the laws of war, and other aspects of Tribunals jurisprudence are critical aspects of modeling that take place between Centurion and the Mirror Team. Transition of Centurion to fine tuning and integration with third party platforms will continue through the remainder of Protocol IV.

Journalists seeking to engage with the Tribunals, Centurion, and related assets are invited to submit their request for accreditation to Throne Dynamics through our media page.

All readers of this Report are encouraged to read the Founder's Substack, take their complimentary Raw Human Capital and Militant Rank assessments, and create their complimentary Academy account.

Individuals who seek timely and ongoing notification of Company Reports and Risk Division Advisories should subscribe to our official Telegram channel.

Investors, partners, and clients with questions should reach out to their Relationship Manager.